| Category | Details |
|---|---|
| Full Name | Stacey Chanelle Clare Solomon-Swash |
| Date of Birth | October 4, 1989 |
| Age (as of 2025) | 35 years old |
| Place of Birth | Dagenham, London, England |
| Spouse | Joe Swash (married 2022) |
| Children | Five children |
| Known For | Loose Women, Sort Your Life Out, I’m a Celebrity, The X Factor (2009) |
| Award Nominations | Two BAFTA TV Awards (2025) |
| Instagram Handle | @staceysolomon |
| Residence | Pickle Cottage, Essex |
| Stylists Behind the Look | Faye Sawyer and seamstress Issy |
| Reference | Instagram – Stacey Solomon |
At the 2025 BAFTA TV Awards, Stacey Solomon exuded emotion in addition to style. She decided to wear her wedding gown, the most significant dress in her life, rather than a designer sample. Under the glare of camera flashes, the freshly tailored gown made a second appearance—this time for validation rather than vows. Reimagining her bridal gown for the red carpet was a subtle act of rebellion in a society that is frequently fixated on disposability, in addition to being a personal act of love.
She had worn it once, at their Essex estate on that bright day in 2022 when she married actor Joe Swash. Like so many bridal relics, the dress had stayed boxed and hidden away ever since. She was suddenly struck with the sadness of that. She paid tribute to a garment too important to gather dust by having seamstress Issy assist her stylist and longtime friend Faye in reshaping it. This sentiment was perfectly encapsulated in her Instagram post: “Wearing it once feels like a travesty.”
The feelings of many women who consider their wedding dress to be more than just fabric—a journal entry written in satin—are remarkably similar to that sentiment. Particularly in celebrity fashion, where excess is usually praised, Solomon’s ability to revitalize hers is incredibly successful in inspiring others to see the beauty in sustainability.
Stacey’s show Sort Your Life Out received nominations for two BAFTAs (Entertainment Performance and Factual Entertainment), but the awards went to someone else. She expressed her disappointment with unvarnished honesty, saying, “I’m devastated for our whole team. They truly deserve BAFTA. She didn’t play down her feelings. Rather, she demonstrated the closer relationship between her work and her principles, which include promoting emotional health, clarity, and simplicity.
Stacey’s on-screen persona has significantly grown more intimate and nuanced over the last 12 months. She invited viewers into her daily routines with Joe, their kids, and even their dogs and ducks through her BBC show that chronicled life at Pickle Cottage. However, there was a price for the transparency. According to reports, the couple chose to go to marriage counseling after struggling with the impact of cameras in their house. They did this in a way that reflected a larger trend toward normalizing relationship maintenance, which was previously taboo among public figures.
According to insiders, their decision was motivated by commitment rather than a crisis. An insider told OK! magazine, “They love each other and would never want to get to a point where they don’t.” Stacey is especially relatable because of her candor. Her willingness to display vulnerability is extremely uncommon in an industry full of polished facades, which may be why her fan base is so devoted.
Once representing a personal pledge, the dress she wore now had a new meaning behind its stitching. Despite being illuminated by hundreds of flashbulbs, it maintained its original warmth while walking the red carpet. The ability of clothing to evoke strong emotions has long been recognized by fashion historians. Solomon’s deed demonstrates how layers of memory enhance beauty. In the same way that Stella McCartney promoted sustainable haute couture and Vivienne Westwood redefined punk aesthetics, Stacey’s moment subtly questioned red carpet conventions.
In an effort to encourage environmentally friendly decisions, celebrities like Jane Fonda and Cate Blanchett have reworn gowns in recent years. However, Stacey’s actions felt personal, whereas theirs felt symbolic. The change was emotional, even restorative, in addition to being purely sartorial. She turned nostalgia into narrative by wearing her dress to a public celebration, bringing memory into the spotlight.
Despite not winning the prize, she had a very successful night. Her dress, which was made with love, memories, and astute tailoring, was superior to many couture creations. It was no longer merely a dress. It was a tale that followed her around. This was more than just design; it was fashion with purpose. And Solomon’s enduring resonance is a result of this harmony between sentiment and substance.
She started a silent discussion about sentimental fashion by opting for reuse rather than replacement. Would more public personalities reconsider their use of clothing as emotional artifacts as a result of this? It is feasible. In addition to redefining personal style, particularly creative methods like this have an impact on more general discussions about identity, sustainability, and narrative.
Her post has received a lot of praise and shares in recent days. Many commended the purpose in addition to the appearance. Comments like “I can’t wait to see you in it!” and “That’s a fabulous idea, Stacey!” were left by fans. There was an instant emotional resonance. This was connection, not just celebrity content.
Stacey Solomon did more than just walk a carpet by incorporating her personal story into a public event. She reminded the audience that just like relationships, clothes should be lived in, loved, and, if at all possible, worn again.
